Legal Opinion
Revert v. Ray
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided November 28, 1979No. 10246PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Mowbray, C. J.:
The instant appeal centers about the disputed right to use the waters emanating from the Beatty (also known as Revert) Springs. Clara and Theodore Ray, contending that those waters are public waters, applied to the State Engineer for an appropriation of five cubic feet per second of water from the springs. Claiming a vested right to use those waters, Arthur Revert, Robert A. Revert, and the A. Revert Trust opposed the Rays’ application. Following a hearing, the State Engineer concluded that the Beatty Springs were in fact public waters and granted the Rays’…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re Waters of Manse SpringNevada Supreme Court · 1940
- City of North Las Vegas v. Public Service CommissionNevada Supreme Court · 1967
- Franktown Creek Irrigation Co. v. Marlette Lake Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1961
- Wright v. State Insurance CommissionerOregon Supreme Court · 1969
- State Ex Rel. Johns v. GragsonNevada Supreme Court · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Town of Eureka v. Office of the State EngineerNevada Supreme Court · 1992
- Beavers v. State, Department of Motor Vehicles & Public SafetyNevada Supreme Court · 1993
- United States v. Orr Water Ditch Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Bacher v. Office of the State EngineerNevada Supreme Court · 2006
- United States v. Alpine Land & Reservoir Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.