Handy v. City of Lawton
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1DissentOpala, Chief Justice
The court holds today that the “collateral source rule” 1 prevents the defendant-City, qua plaintiff’s employer, from securing credit on a tort recovery judgment for medical expenses paid the plaintiff from its comprehensive self-insurance fund. Insofar as the court (1) treats the credit issue as cognizable on a “motion for remittitur” 2 and (2) announces that payments made pursuant to a City-maintained, insurance fund are from a collateral source,31 recede from the pronouncement as well as from today’s judgment. I would hold that the City’s quest for credit was prematurely pressed. Its plea…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Eichel v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Flick v. CrouchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- Bane v. Anderson, Bryant & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- United States v. William H. Price, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1961
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.