Legal Opinion · Dissent

Handy v. City of Lawton

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 14, 1992No. 74064Published

1DissentOpala, Chief Justice

The court holds today that the “collateral source rule” 1 prevents the defendant-City, qua plaintiff’s employer, from securing credit on a tort recovery judgment for medical expenses paid the plaintiff from its comprehensive self-insurance fund. Insofar as the court (1) treats the credit issue as cognizable on a “motion for remittitur” 2 and (2) announces that payments made pursuant to a City-maintained, insurance fund are from a collateral source,31 recede from the pronouncement as well as from today’s judgment. I would hold that the City’s quest for credit was prematurely pressed. Its plea…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Eichel v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Flick v. CrouchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  4. Bane v. Anderson, Bryant & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  5. United States v. William H. Price, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1961

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API