Schultz v. Herndon
Texas Supreme Court
Error from Guadalupe. Tried below before the Hon. J. J. Thornton. The petition referred to the notes sued on as “ part of this petition.” The other facts are fully stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLindsay, J.
Upon three promissory notes, executed and delivered cotemporaneously by the appellee to the appellant, for the aggregate sum of two hundred and fifty dollars, all maturing at the same time, and bearing the same rate of interest, suit was brought by the appellant against the appellee, and an attachment sued out and levied upon certain specific property of the appellee. To the petition of the plaintiff in the court below, a demurrer was filed and sustained by the court. This judgment is now sought to be reversed in this court.
The petition sets out, in language at least certain to a common…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Mays v. RutledgeTexas Supreme Court · 1873
- Makainai v. Goo Wan HoyHawaii Supreme Court · 1903