Legal Opinion

Commonwealth Ex Rel. Kreiling v. Kreiling

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 11, 1944No. Appeal, 76PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion bx

Baldrige, P. J.;

An appeal involving the custody of small children always presents a perplexing problem. That is especially true when, as here, the father and mother are the contending parties. The court below in this habeas corpus proceeding concluded that the mother is the proper person to have the custody of her three small children, three, five and eight years of age. The father of the children appealed. We granted a supersedeas on his application, and the children are now in his care.

The parties were married January 1, 1935, and lived together until February 18, 1944, residing…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DavenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  2. Latney's AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Goessler v. BernsteinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Hild v. HildCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Schofield v. SchofieldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Williams v. PriceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  4. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Burke v. BirchSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  5. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Children's Aid Society v. GardSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API