Commonwealth v. Ostrosky
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
CONCURRING AND DISSENTING STATEMENT BY
POPOVICH, J.:
¶ 1 I disagree with the majority’s decision to reverse Appellant’s judgment of sentence pertaining to the conviction under the retaliation statute. Accordingly, I respectfully dissent to this holding. I agree with the majority’s dismissal of Appellant’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim without prejudice to raise on collateral review.
¶ 2 The majority held that the legislature did not intend to punish the single incident of threatening verbal conduct under the retaliation statute. Maj. Op., at 430-31. I disagree.
¶ 3 The crime of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. GrantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Commonwealth v. RossSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Commonwealth v. SalisburySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Commonwealth v. BlessittSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004