Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Commonwealth v. Ostrosky

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 4, 2005Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

CONCURRING AND DISSENTING STATEMENT BY

POPOVICH, J.:

¶ 1 I disagree with the majority’s decision to reverse Appellant’s judgment of sentence pertaining to the conviction under the retaliation statute. Accordingly, I respectfully dissent to this holding. I agree with the majority’s dismissal of Appellant’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim without prejudice to raise on collateral review.

¶ 2 The majority held that the legislature did not intend to punish the single incident of threatening verbal conduct under the retaliation statute. Maj. Op., at 430-31. I disagree.

¶ 3 The crime of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GrantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Commonwealth v. RossSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. Commonwealth v. SalisburySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Commonwealth v. BlessittSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API