Legal Opinion

MacGregor v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board

California Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1984No. S.F. 24706PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

REYNOSO, J.

When a worker leaves her employment to accompany her “nonmarital partner” to another state in order to maintain the familial relationship they have established with their child does she voluntarily leave work with good cause within the meaning of the statute governing eligibility for unemployment insurance benefits? We left open the possibility that a claimant might show good cause in such circumstances when we decided Norman v. Unemployment Ins. Appeals Bd. (1983) 34 Cal.3d 1 [192 Cal.Rptr. 134, 663 P.2d 904] less than two years ago. We now hold that Patricia MacGregor has…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. De Burgh v. De BurghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Interstate Brands v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Thomas v. California Employment Stabilization CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. California Portland Cement Co. v. California Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. Moore Shipbuilding Corp. v. Indus. Accident Comm'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ledger v. TippittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  2. Altaville Drug Store, Inc. v. Employment Development DepartmentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Hinman v. Department of Personnel AdministrationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. Altaville Drug Store, Inc. v. Employment Development DepartmentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Carlson v. Center of Resources for Independent PeopleIdaho Supreme Court · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API