Exxon Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partKashiwa, Judge
In this case of offshore drilling operations, the majority of the court by affirming and adopting the trial judge’s recommended decision allows as intangible drilling and development costs (“IDC”) those costs incurred in fabricating-offshore drilling platforms (“platforms”), moving them to location and making them operational. I, however, would allow only the latter two groups of expenditures to qualify for the IDC option, denying the option to those costs incurred in fabricating the component parts (e.g., templets)21 of the drilling platform.
With relation to the IDC problem before us, I…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- New Colonial Ice Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Deputy, Administratrix v. Du PontSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. Olympic Radio & Television, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Harper Oil Company, a Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
- New World Life Ins. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.