Legal Opinion
Nixon v. Quick
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided September 27, 2001No. 98-SP-589PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WAGNER, Chief Judge:
Appellant, Clarence Nixon, appeals from the summary denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus without a hearing. In his petition in the trial court, Nixon alleged that the District of Columbia Board of Parole denied him a fair parole revocation hearing by: (1) excluding him from the revocation hearing during the testimony of an adverse witness; (2) refusing to disclose to him prior to the hearing a letter from his former girlfriend which was used as evidence against him; and (3) failing to hold the hearing within a reasonable time. We conclude that Nixon has…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Price v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Paul Ivan Birzon, in Behalf of Morris Satz v. Edward S. King, United States Marshal and Hon. Michael A. Amico, Sheriff of Erie CountyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Abdullah v. RoachDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- United States ex rel. Carson v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Curtis E. Crawford v. Patricia A. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
- Boone v. MenifeeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Crawford, Curtis v. Jackson, PatriciaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
- State ex rel. Patton v. RubensteinWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2003