Legal Opinion

Vector-Springfield Properties, Ltd. v. Central Illinois Light Company, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided March 17, 1997No. 96-3009PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CUMMINGS, Circuit Judge.

On July 6, 1994, plaintiff Vector-Spiing-field Properties, Ltd. (‘Vector-Springfield”) brought this action against defendant Central Illinois Light Company (“CILCO”) alleging three common law causes of action under Illinois law: trespass, nuisance and strict liability for ultrahazardous activity. Vector-Springfield maintains that it has been damaged as a result of contamination discovered on its property in Springfield, Illinois and that such damage was caused by CILCO’s predecessor.

On July 11, 1996, the district court issued an order granting CILCO’s motion for…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Knox College v. Celotex Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Hermitage Corp. v. Contractors Adjustment Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Jackson Jordan, Inc. v. Leydig, Voit & MayerIllinois Supreme Court · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Carl E. Thomas v. Guardsmark, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  2. Ronald Nowak v. St. Rita High SchoolCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  3. Nancy Gracia v. Volvo Europa Truck, N v. a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  4. Fisher v. Wayne Dalton Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  5. Liu v. T & H Machine, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API