Dean v. St. Paul Union Depot Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Eamsey county, Brill, J., presiding, sustaining a demurrer to the complaint.
1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.
The plaintiff appeals from an order sustaining defendant’s demurrer to the complaint, on the ground that it failed to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. From said complaint, and a stipulation as to certain facts, made by the parties and by agreement considered as if the facts therein stated had been a part of the pleading demurred to, it appears that the defendant is a do*361mestie corporation, organized for and engaged in the business of furnishing and conducting a union depot and station-house in the city of St. Paul, in which several lines of railway deliver and receive…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Stewart v. . Brooklyn and Crosstown R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Isaacs v. . Third Avenue R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1871
- McCord v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- Ahlbeck v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
3Cited by22 opinions
- Ponticas v. K.M.S. InvestmentsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Castaneda v. OlsherCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Corrigan v. ElsingerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Mandy v. Minnesota Mining & ManufacturingDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1996
- Porter v. Grennan Bakeries, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.