Legal Opinion

State v. . Sloan

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 22, 1930PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stacy, C. J.,

after stating the case: Error is assigned because the trial court, in charging the jury, stated “the defendant admits he has a criminal record, more or less; that at one time he was convicted of larceny,” etc., whereas the admission made by the prisoner was that he had been on the roads of Richmond County and “they claimed I took an automobile.”' - The assignment is without merit. The court’s statement is warránted by the cross-examination of the prisoner. There is no practicable difference between the defendant’s testimony and the court’s interpretation of it. For the court to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. . ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. . LeaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  2. State v. . BittingsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  3. State v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  4. State v. . HobbsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  5. State v. . KingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API