Legal Opinion

Christiansen v. Eral

District Court, N.D. Iowa

Decided November 19, 2021No. 5:21-cv-04017Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA WESTERN DIVISION DEAN CHRISTIANSEN, Plaintiff, Case No. 21-CV-4017-KEM vs. MEMORANDUM OPINION CHRISTOPHER ERAL and REX AND ORDER MUELLER, in their individual and official capacities, and the CITY OF SIOUX CITY, Defendants. ____________________ At issue is the reasonableness of the pursuit intervention technique (PIT) maneuver to end a high-speed chase. Because I agree that Plaintiff Dean Christiansen’s complaint fails to state a claim for excessive force or substantive due process under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, I grant Defendants’…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API