Legal Opinion

United States v. Bruce Barnes

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 25, 1963No. 15088_1PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant-Appellant, Bruce Barnes, was convicted by a jury of violating federal laws relating to the illicit manufacture of “moonshine” whiskey. Because the trial judge did not, by cautionary instruction, and as requested by appellant, limit to impeachment purposes the jury’s consideration of an out-of-court statement made by a witness, we reverse and remand the case for a new trial.

The government proofs showed that appellant Barnes, with two others, Isaac and Robert Rollins, was discovered at a still site where illicit whiskey was being made. All three were indicted. Both Isaac and Robert…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bridges v. WixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Edward Earl Brooks v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
  3. Truby Clarence Slade v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  4. Carl Eugene Valentine v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. DyeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
  2. Jerome Benson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
  3. Annette Rush, as Natural Mother of Johnathan Rush, a Minor v. Illinois Central Railroad Company, AKA Canadian National-Illinois Central RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. Claude Lewis LipscombCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
  5. United States v. William 'Buddy' LesterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API