Legal Opinion

State v. Dobrova

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1985No. S-290PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATTHEWS, Justice.

The question presented is whether a trial court has the authority to admit to bail a convicted defendant who is appealing his sentence, but not his conviction. The court of appeals held that trial courts have inherent authority to permit bail during sentence appeals. Dobrova v. State, 674 P.2d 834 (Alaska App.1984). We agree for the reasons expressed by the court of appeals.

At common law, bail decisions including questions of bail pending appeal were considered to be part of the inherent power of the courts.1 Whether that inherent power in Alaska is subject to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. WassillieAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Dobrova v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1984
  3. Rose v. NickesonConnecticut Superior Court · 1970
  4. DeAngelis v. State of South CarolinaDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1971

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hosier v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1998
  2. Hicks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2016
  3. Burt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1991
  4. Shepersky v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2017
  5. Hicks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API