Legal Opinion
Coughlan v. Grande & Son, Inc.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided April 4, 1955PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpalding, J.
This is a suit to enjoin the defendants from blasting on land adjoining the plaintiffs’ property, and to recover compensation for damage caused by the blasting. At the time of the hearing the blasting operations of the defendants had ceased and there was no need for injunctive relief. The judge, however, retained the suit for the assessment of damages. Reynolds v. Grow, 265 Mass. 578, 580. He made findings of material facts and awarded damages to the plaintiffs against the defendant Grande & Son, Inc., in the sum of $1,500. As against the defendant Monahan the judge ordered that the bill be…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Dolham v. PetersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Hakkila v. Old Colony Broken Stone & Concrete Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
- DeVeer v. PiersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
- Herrick v. City of SpringfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- McConnon v. Charles H. Hodgate Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- The Clark-Aiken Co. v. Cromwell-Wright Co. Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Sullivan v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
- Kushner v. Dravo Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
- Dyer v. Maine Drilling & Blasting, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
- Thurlow v. Town of ProvincetownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.