Multnomah County v. Mittleman
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Dissent
LEE, cL,
dissenting.
One of the defendants’ contentions was that plaintiff’s taxing ordinance violates Art IX, § 1a of the Oregon Constitution which in pertinent part provides:
"* * * The Legislative Assembly shall not declare an emergency to any act regulating taxation or exemption.” (Emphasis supplied.)
I dissent because the majority has not met this constitutional question which I feel is dispositive of this case.
On November 8, 1960 the people enacted, by initiative, Art VI, § 10 of the Oregon Constitution which provides in part that:
"* * * The initiative and referendum powers reserved to the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Monaghan v. School District No. 1Oregon Supreme Court · 1957
- Schubel v. OlcottOregon Supreme Court · 1912
- Horner's Market, Inc. v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1970
- Garbade and Boynton v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1950
- Horner's Market v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.