Legal Opinion · Dissent

Multnomah County v. Mittleman

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 3, 1976No. 394-755, CA 4836Published

1Dissent

LEE, cL,

dissenting.

One of the defendants’ contentions was that plaintiff’s taxing ordinance violates Art IX, § 1a of the Oregon Constitution which in pertinent part provides:

"* * * The Legislative Assembly shall not declare an emergency to any act regulating taxation or exemption.” (Emphasis supplied.)

I dissent because the majority has not met this constitutional question which I feel is dispositive of this case.

On November 8, 1960 the people enacted, by initiative, Art VI, § 10 of the Oregon Constitution which provides in part that:

"* * * The initiative and referendum powers reserved to the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Monaghan v. School District No. 1Oregon Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Schubel v. OlcottOregon Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Horner's Market, Inc. v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Garbade and Boynton v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Horner's Market v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API