Taylor v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Pannell, Presiding Judge.
1. "The fact that the informant is a witness is not controlling where such evidence is not necessary to obtain a conviction. United States Ex Rel. Abbot v. Twomey, 460 F2d 400,402 (2). In Roviaro v. United States, 353 U. S. 53, 62 (77 SC 623,11 LE2d 639), it is stated: 'We believe that no fixed rule with respect to disclosure is justifiable. The problem is one that calls for balancing the public interest in protecting the flow of information against the individual’s right to prepare his defense. Whether a proper balance renders nondisclosure erroneous must depend on…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scull v. THE STATECourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Welch v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Crosby v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
- Estevez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975