Crane v. Pacific Bank
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco dissolving an attachment. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Haynes, C.
Appeal from an order dissolving an attachment.
On the tenth day of August, 1893, the plaintiff brought his action in the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco to recover from the defendant, a banking corporation, a certain sum alleged to have been deposited with it as a commercial deposit, and, on the same day, procured a writ of attachment to issue in said action, and which was on the same day levied upon assets of said bank sufficient to cover his claim.
On November 17, 1893, the defendant served upon plaintiff notice of a motion to dissolve said attachment “ upon…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People ex rel. Gerberding v. Superior Court of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1893
- People's Home Savings Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Long v. Superior Court of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by12 opinions
- Winchester v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Kaye v. MetzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Evans v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Murphy v. Pacific BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Argues v. Union Sav. Bank of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.