Legal Opinion

Olmstead v. Shakespeare

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided May 30, 2002No. 3437PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStilwell, J.

Charles and Joanna Olmstead appeal the order of the circuit court dismissing their tort actions against Shakespeare. The circuit court held that Olmstead was Shakespeare’s statutory employee and thus barred by the exclusive remedy provision of the Workers’ Compensation Act. We reverse and remand.

FACTS/PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Olmstead is the owner-operator of a truck-trailer combination used for long distance hauling of goods and materials. He leased his equipment to Hot Shot Express, which provided his tags, ICC licensing, and placards. He was paid by Hot Shot based on the miles he drove. Hot Shot…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bridges v. Wyandotte Worsted Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
  2. Caton v. Winslow Bros. & Smith Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  3. Ham v. Mullins Lumber Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
  4. Caughman v. Columbia Y. M. C. A.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
  5. Peay v. U.S. Silica Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. James v. ANNE'S INC.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  2. Olmstead v. ShakespeareSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  3. James v. ANNE'S INC.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  4. James v. ANNE'S INC.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  5. Keene v, CNA Holdings, LLCSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API