Legal Opinion

Pegnatori v. Pure Sports Technologies LLC

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided October 11, 2023No. 2:23-cv-01424Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION CARL PEGNATORI and MONSTA ) ATHLETICS LLC, a California Limited ) Liability Company, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) No. 2:23-cv-01424-DCN vs. ) ) ORDER PURE SPORTS TECHNOLOGIES LLC, a ) South Carolina Limited Liability Company, ) ) Defendant. ) _______________________________________) The following matter is before the court on plaintiffs Carl Pegnatori (“Pegnatori”) and Monsta Athletics LLC’s (“Monsta Athletics”) (together, “plaintiffs”) motion for preliminary injunction, ECF No. 16. For the reasons set forth…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  5. Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API