Legal Opinion

Kerfoot v. Neal

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 6, 1934No. 20791PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.

M. E. Neal, one of the defendants in error, commenced an action against C. W. Kerfoot, the Kiowa Lumber Company, Wallace Estill, B. Salyer, H. B. Jones, and others, by which he sought a judgment for an amount due him for labor performed in the construction of a dwelling house on the real estate involved in this action and for the foreclosure of a laborer’s lien on that real estate, together with the improvements thereon. The Kiowa Lumber Company, Wallace Estill, and others filed cross-petitions praying for the same kind 'of relief. The defendant C. W. Kerfoot denied all of the claims, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Okmulgee Plumbing Co. v. ComstockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  2. Kerfoot v. SalyerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Cloud v. State Election BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API