Legal Opinion
United States v. Alejandro Garcia Ibarra
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 3, 1990No. 90-8018PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McKAY, Circuit Judge.
This appeal arises from an order of the district court suppressing certain evidence. The district court found that a search of the defendant’s vehicle by law enforcement officials violated the defendant’s rights under the fourth amendment of the United States Constitution. The United States has appealed. It asserts that the search of the vehicle was pursuant to a valid consent and that, in any event, the evidence should not be excluded under the doctrine of inevitable discovery announced in Nix v. Williams, 467 U.S. 431, 104 S.Ct. 2501, 81 L.Ed.2d 377 (1984). The…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Above Belt, Inc. v. Mel Bohannan Roofing, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1983
- United States v. DieterSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. HealySupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. Miguel Angel RecaldeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- United States v. IbarraSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Michael Lee Sammons v. Maury Taylor, Six Unidentified Fbi Agents or Department of Justice Employees United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
- Jimmie D. Oyler v. Fred Allenbrand and the Attorney General of KansasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Alejandro Garcia IbarraCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Charles Thomas Dickerson, Washington Legal Foundation Safe Streets Coalition, Amici CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.