Legal Opinion

Martin v. Scott Paper Co.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided September 8, 1981PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARTER, Justice.

The employee, Donald Martin, appeals from a pro forma decree of the Superior Court (Kennebec County) affirming a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission on a petition for review of incapacity filed by his employer, Scott Paper Company. We affirm the judgment below.

I

We first address Scott Paper’s contention that the pro forma decree does not comply with the requirement that the judgment “contain within its four corners the mandate of the court without reference to other documents.” Poitras v. R. E. Glidden Body Shop, Inc., Me., 424 A.2d 326, 326 (1981); Murphy v. City…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kushner v. Winterthur Swiss Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  2. Dunton v. Eastern Fine Paper CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  3. Your Home, Inc. v. City of PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  4. Soucy v. Fraser Paper, LimitedSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1970
  5. Boothbay Register, Inc. v. MurphySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Capul v. Fleet Bank of MaineSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
  2. D'Amato v. S.D. Warren Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
  3. Dube v. Paradis Pulp & Logging Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
  4. McLellan v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  5. Russell v. Duchess FootwearSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API