Legal Opinion

Badali v. Hartman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 26, 1963No. Appeal, 75PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

Per Curiam,

A writ of certiorari was issued by the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County to review the action of an alderman. The lower court reversed the action of the alderman and we issued a certiorari to review, its decision.

Where a statute expressly denies the right of appeal, or provides that the action of the court below shall be final, then review" may be had only by the Supreme Court by means of narrow, certiorari. . Under narrow certiorari our scope of review is limited to a determination of whether the court had jurisdiction; whether the proceedings were regular; whether…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. DeVito v. Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  2. Meell AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  3. Palmer & Co. v. LacockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Philadelphia v. DORTORTSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. Jenner Township Annexation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  3. Graybill & Bushong, Inc. v. Board of Finance & RevenueSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  4. Finance Co. v. Board of Finance & RevenueSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API