Legal Opinion

Krigel v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided October 21, 1981No. 434-78PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This case comes before the court on defendant’s motion, filed August 26, 1981, requesting that the court adopt the recommended decision of Trial Judge Roald A. Hogenson, filed July 17, 1981, pursuant to Rule 134(h), as the basis for its judgment in this case since plaintiff has failed to file a notice of intention to except or exceptions thereto and the time for so filing pursuant to the Rules of the court has expired. Upon consideration thereof, without oral argument, since the court agrees with the recommended decision, as hereinafter set forth*, it hereby grants defendant’s motion and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Somali Development Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lion Raisins, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
  2. Lin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
  3. Champagne v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2014
  4. Platte Pipe Line Company, a Delaware Corporation v. United States of America and Willwood Irrigation District, a Wyoming CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  5. Sepehry-Fard v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API