Teagarden v. Hetfield
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Fountain Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtWorden, J.
Trespass by the appellee against the appellant, for killing a mare. The complaint charges the unlawful killing, by the defendant, of the mare of the plaintiff, of the value of 150 dollars, by which trespass the plaintiff was damaged, and claims judgment for 200 dollars in damages.
Trial, and verdict for plaintiff for 131 dollars, on which judgment was rendered, over a motion for a new trial.
A bill of exceptions setting out the evidence, shows that on the trial, the mare was proven to be worth from 85 dollars to 125 dollars. It further appears that the plaintiff was permitted to prove that at…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hooker v. State ex rel. HaynesIndiana Supreme Court · 1844
- Young v. TustinIndiana Supreme Court · 1837
- Phillips v. NicholasIndiana Supreme Court · 1832
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ohio & Mississippi Railroad v. HechtIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. HolcombIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
- Buckley v. BuckleyNevada Supreme Court · 1877
- Plunkett v. Minneapolis, Sault Ste. Marie & Atlantic Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1891
- C. J. L. Myer & Sons Co. v. DaviesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1885
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.