Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Houser v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 17, 1932No. Docket No. 8094Published

1Concurrence

CONREY, P. J., Concurring.

I concurin the judgment. The decisions relied upon by petitioner are not, in my opinion, sufficient to sustain his position. I will here refer to the cases cited by him, except that I omit those which I think are not at all in touch with the question here to be decided. In Cohen v. Gray, 70 Cal. 85 [11 Pac. 508, 509], the court allowed a restraining • order, together with an order to show cause why an injunction should not be gr'anted, and thereafter granted an injunction pendente lite. On appeal from the second injunction order the Supreme Court remarked that “upon…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Curtiss v. BachmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Maier v. LuceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  3. City of Los Angeles v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Cohen v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API