Legal Opinion

King v. Garnes

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 26, 1973No. 73-639PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellees contend that the filing was not timely because it was not filed within ten days after the administrator’s decision on reconsideration was mailed to appellant. However, an examination of the record discloses no evidence to show when the decision was, in fact, mailed, nor did the employer attempt to assert a date of mailing before the Board of Review.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed.

Judgment reversed.

O’Neill, C. J., Herbert, CorrigaN, SterN, Celebrezze, W. BrowN and P. Broww, JJ., concur.

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. McCruter v. Board of ReviewOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Proctor v. GilesOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Checker Realty Co. v. Ohio Real Estate CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Geroc v. Ohio Veterinary Medical BoardOhio Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Wycuff v. Fotomat Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API