Legal Opinion

Dale v. Hahn

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 26, 1970No. 69 Civ. 3531PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COOPER, District Judge.

This is a purported class action by plaintiff Dale (1) for a declaratory judgment that section 102 of the Mental Hygiene Law, McKinney’s Consol.Laws, c. 27 of the State of New York (formerly § 1374 of the Civil Practice Act), which provides a procedure for the appointment of a committee for a patient of a state mental institution, denies plaintiff due process and the equal protection of the laws and invades her right to privacy, (2) for an injunction restraining further enforcement, operation or execution of the alleged unconstitutional statute, (3) *1297for a return…

2Cases cited61 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Randone v. Appellate DepartmentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Dale v. HahnCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
  3. Dale v. HahnCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  4. In re Vance A.New York City Family Court · 1980
  5. Johnson v. MooreWashington Supreme Court · 1972

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API