Legal Opinion
Jessup v. Secretary of Department of Health & Human Services
United States Court of Claims
Decided May 20, 1992No. 91-49VPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
YOCK, Judge.
Pursuant to RUSCC Appendix J, Vaccine Rules of the Office of the Special Masters of the United States Claims Court, specifically Vaccine Rule 23, on December 26, 1991, the respondent filed a Motion for Review of the special master’s November 26, 1991, decision on attorneys’ fees in this matter. The petitioners filed a response to the Motion for Review on April 20, 1992. For the reasons stated herein, the decision of the special master is reversed and no award of attorneys’ fees or costs shall be made.
Facts
Jennifer Jessup was born on April 18, 1988, and she received a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Soriano v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Johns-Manville Corporation and Johns-Manville Sales Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Lamb v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rooks v. Secretary of Department of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
- Staples v. Secretary of Department of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
- Anthony Bowman v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Lucille Dalpe v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013