Legal Opinion
In re Maximo M.
New York City Family Court
Decided June 24, 2000PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Lee H. Elkins, J.
The Commissioner of the Administration for Children’s Services of the City of New York (ACS) brings this motion, by order to show cause,1 to enforce a subpoena compelling the disclosure of records regarding the respondent’s treatment for drug abuse by Addiction Research and Treatment Corporation (ARTC). ARTC is a licensed provider of out-patient medical, psychiatric, substance and alcohol abuse counseling and family development services. ACS seeks leave to subpoena said records and testimony of respondent’s treatment providers, if necessary, for use at…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Commissioner of Social Services v. David R. S.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
- In re Lameek L.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- In re Doe ChildrenNew York City Family Court · 1978
- In re of W.H.New York City Family Court · 1993
- City of New York v. Bleuler Psychotherapy Center, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1999
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re Arthur S.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- In re Keira O.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re Marlene D.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001