Legal Opinion

Plano v. City of Renton

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 26, 2000No. 45578-8-IPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBecker, J.

Appellant Linda Plano sued the City of Renton for injuries she suffered when she slipped and fell on a ramp leading to a moorage dock at a Renton park. Renton claimed immunity based on the recreational use *911statute, RCW 4.24.210. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Renton and dismissed Plano’s case. We reverse because Renton charges moorage fees. The statutory immunity does not apply if the landowner charges “a fee of any kind” for the use of the land or water area where the injury occurs. RCW 4.24.210(1).

The City of Renton owns and maintains Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park on…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Rozner v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Simpson Tacoma Kraft Co. v. Department of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Federated American Insurance v. StrongWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Jones v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  5. Gaeta v. Seattle City LightCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Michaels v. CH2M Hill, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Camicia v. Howard S. Wright Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Michaels v. CH2M Hill, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Plano v. City of RentonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  5. Leishman v. Ogden Murphy Wallace, PLLCWashington Supreme Court · 2021

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API