Legal Opinion

Allegheny County v. Maryland Casualty Co.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 15, 1941No. 8788PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

GIBSON, District Judge.

After verdict for plaintiff, the defendant moved for judgment n. o. v., and also filed an alternative motion for a new trial. The motion for judgment was allowed, but no order was made upon the motion for a new trial, as prescribed by Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Duncan, 311 U.S. 243, 61 S.Ct. 189, 85 L.Ed. 147. Therefore, pursuant to motion of counsel for plaintiff, the order for judgment has been vacated pending decision upon the motion for a new trial.

In view of the order for judgment n. o. v., which is based upon the conclusion that the matter in issue had been…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Fleming v. AdamsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. Bassett v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Allegheny County v. Maryland Casualty Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API