Legal Opinion
Fricke v. Daylin, Inc.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided February 13, 1975No. 74 C 189PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
NEAHER, District Judge.
This stockholder’s derivative action is before the court on an application under Rule 23.1, F.R.Civ.P., for approval of a proposed settlement. By court order, and on notice mailed to all stockholders setting forth its terms, a hearing on the proposed settlement was held October 16, 1974, at which counsel for the parties and for a number of objecting stockholders were heard. In view of the objections raised, that hearing was adjourned at the request of counsel to afford an opportunity to determine whether the differences between the proponents and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Pepper v. LittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corporation, Manhattan-Ward, Incorporated v. Grinnell Corporation, 1225 Vine Street Building, Inc. v. Grinnell CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- West Virginia v. Chas. Pfizer & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- Kerbs v. California Eastern Airways, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1952
- Gottlieb v. Heyden Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1952
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re Traffic Executive Association Eastern Railroads, Axinn & Sons Lumber Co., Inc. v. The Long Island Rail Road Company, and Third-Party v. Traffic Executive Association Eastern Railroads, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Goldsholl v. ShapiroDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976
- Oscar Gruss & Son v. Geon Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1980
- Spiekermann v. Whittaker Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1978
- Axinn & Sons Lumber Co. v. Long Island Rail RoadCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980