Legal Opinion

Colegrove v. Barrett

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 10, 1947No. 1031PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Per curiam

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. In view of the Court's refusal to grant rehearing in Colegrove v. Green, 328 U. S. 549, rehearing denied, 329 U. S. 825, 828, and its dismissal of the appeals in Cook v. Fortson and Turman v. Duckworth, 329 U. S. 675, rehearing denied, 329 U. S. 829, Mr. Justice Rutledge concurs in the dismissal of this appeal. Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Douglas, and Mr. Justice Murphy are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Colegrove v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Earl F. Cook v. Ben W. FortsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1946

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. MacDougall v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Scholle v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Baker v. CarrDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1959
  5. Delozier v. Tyrone Area School BoardDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1965

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API