Bush v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1DissentFriedman, J.
I respectfully dissent. The majority “narrowly” construes section 316 of the Workers’ Compensation Act (Act), Act of June 2, 1915, P.L. 736, as amended, 77 P.S. § 604, to prohibit the commutation of a portion of ongoing total disability benefits. (Majority op. at 684.) For the reasons that follow, I do not accept the majority’s narrow construction of section 316 of the Act.
I. Statutory Language
It is well established that we must liberally construe the provisions of the Act to effectuate its humanitarian objectives, and, in doing so, we must construe borderline interpretations in favor of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Harper & Collins v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Woodward v. Pittsburgh Engineering & Construction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Indiana Floral Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Mason v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Green v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.