Legal Opinion

Meredith v. Cockshoot

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 14, 1944No. 46580PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wennerstrum,’- J.

Plaintiff, the administrator with will annexed of the estate of Anna K. Meredith, deceased, brought a law action on a promissory note against the defendants. At the conclusion of all the testimony Thera Brown Cockshoot was dismissed as one of the defendants by the trial eourt on the ground that there had been a material alteration of tbe note after she signed it. Thereafter the cause-was submitted to the jury as to the liability of the remaining defendant, R. W. Cockshoot. The jury found for the defendant and the plaintiff has appealed from the judgment entered against him…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of StratmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  2. In Re Estate of DolmageSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  3. In Re Will of FishSupreme Court of Iowa · 1935
  4. In Re Estate of MorganSupreme Court of Iowa · 1938
  5. In Re Estate of AllisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Carlson v. Bankers Trust Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1951
  2. Jensen v. SchreckSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
  3. Hamilton v. BethelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
  4. Crandall v. Bankers Life Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1954
  5. Clara B. Scullen, of the Estate of Frank M. Braunberger, Deceased v. Albert J. BraunbergerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API