Legal Opinion

Carlson v. Bankers Trust Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 13, 1951No. 47968PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGarfield, J.

Plaintiff moved to dismiss the executor’s appeal on the ground its brief does not comply with rule 344, Buies of Civil Procedure. The brief does fail to comply in several respects with this rule. For example, there is no reference in the statement of facts or argument to lines of the record as required by rule 344(a) (2). The statements of errors relied on for reversal contain no references to the record to show the manner in which the error arose and the ruling of the court thereon as required by rule 344(a)(4) (First). Some brief points do not state the grounds of complaint of the ruling as…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Wilson v. CorbinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
  2. Roth v. HeadleeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947
  3. In Re Estate of NewsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  4. O'Dell v. O'DellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947
  5. In Re Estate of StratmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Livingston v. DavisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1951
  2. Ruble v. CarrSupreme Court of Iowa · 1953
  3. Stewart v. HiltonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956
  4. Herbst v. TreinenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1958
  5. City of Chariton v. JC Blunk Construction CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1962

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API