Legal Opinion

Conner v. Helvik

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1937No. 7,693PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moeeis

Plaintiffs brought this action to compel the specific performance of a contract to sell and purchase real property. After some preliminary negotiations relative to the sale and purchase, the parties met on March 9, 1935, at the law office of 0 ’Hara & Madeen, at Hamilton, Montana. The plaintiffs made and acknowledged a deed of conveyance to the defendants, and the defendant L. L. Helvik made and signed a check payable to the order of the plaintiffs for the purchase price of the land; the deed and check were deposited with R. A. O’Hara, a member of the law firm mentioned above.

It appears to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Finlen v. HeinzeMontana Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Gravelin v. PorierMontana Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Mathews v. O'DonnellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1921
  4. Ogg v. HermanMontana Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Vance v. ForeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Voyta v. ClontsMontana Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Dalbey v. Equitable L. Assur. Soc. of U.S.Montana Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Sorensen v. JacobsonMontana Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Barney v. Rigby Loan & Investment Co.District Court, D. Idaho · 1972
  5. Brown v. GriffinMontana Supreme Court · 1968

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API