Conner v. Helvik
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moeeis
Plaintiffs brought this action to compel the specific performance of a contract to sell and purchase real property. After some preliminary negotiations relative to the sale and purchase, the parties met on March 9, 1935, at the law office of 0 ’Hara & Madeen, at Hamilton, Montana. The plaintiffs made and acknowledged a deed of conveyance to the defendants, and the defendant L. L. Helvik made and signed a check payable to the order of the plaintiffs for the purchase price of the land; the deed and check were deposited with R. A. O’Hara, a member of the law firm mentioned above.
It appears to…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Finlen v. HeinzeMontana Supreme Court · 1905
- Gravelin v. PorierMontana Supreme Court · 1926
- Mathews v. O'DonnellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1921
- Ogg v. HermanMontana Supreme Court · 1924
- Vance v. ForeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Voyta v. ClontsMontana Supreme Court · 1958
- Dalbey v. Equitable L. Assur. Soc. of U.S.Montana Supreme Court · 1937
- Sorensen v. JacobsonMontana Supreme Court · 1951
- Barney v. Rigby Loan & Investment Co.District Court, D. Idaho · 1972
- Brown v. GriffinMontana Supreme Court · 1968
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.