Legal Opinion
Ricoh Corp. v. PITNEY BOWES, INC.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided May 9, 2007No. Civ. 02-5639 (GEB)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BROWN, Chief Judge.
This matter comes before the Court upon the Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law of Plaintiffs Ricoh Corporation and Ricoh Company, Ltd. (collectively, “Plaintiff’ or “Ricoh”), and the Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law of Defendant Pitney Bowes, Inc. (“Defendant” or “Pit-ney Bowes”). The Court has decided the motions without oraJ argument pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will deny both motions.
BACKGROUND
Since much of the factual background and procedural history of this case has been…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Lightning Lube, Inc. v. Witco Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Elliot Fineman the Industry Network System, Inc. v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- B. Braun Medical, Inc. v. Abbott Laboratories and Np Medical, Inc., Defendants/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Patzig v. O'NeilCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD. v. LUPIN LIMITEDDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021