Legal Opinion

Hedgepeth v. WHITMAN WALKER CLINIC

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided March 1, 2010No. 07-CV-158PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

On consideration of appellant’s petition for rehearing en banc, and the response thereto; and it appearing that the majority of the judges of this court has voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc, it is

ORDERED that appellant’s petition for rehearing en banc is granted, and the opinion and judgment of October 1, 2009, are hereby vacated. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall schedule this matter for argument before the court sitting en banc as soon as the calendar permits. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that appellant shall file its brief within 30 days from the date of this order,…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cesarano v. Reed Smith LLPDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. Hedgepeth v. Whitman Walker ClinicDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hedgepeth v. Whitman Walker ClinicDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API