Legal Opinion
Golenpaul v. Frankel
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 22, 1955PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment dismissing the complaint after trial, unanimously affirmed, with costs. On this record plaintiffs do not establish any right to relief under the previous holdings in this court (Judson v. Franhel, 279 App. Div. 372; Gilligan v. Tishman Realty & Constr. Co., 283 App. Div. 157, affd. 306 N. Y. 974; People ex rel. McGoldrick v. Sterling, 283 App. Div. 88). Nor is any additional ground for relief suggested in the absence of a showing that the sale price to Frankel and-his associates was collusive or contrived. Nor do we find any basis for relief under the regulations of the State Rent…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People ex rel. McGoldrick v. SterlingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
- Gilligan v. Tishman Realty & Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Gilligan v. Tishman Realty & Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
- Judson v. FrankelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
3Cited by5 opinions
- ARS Yonkers Corp. v. SimsYonkers City Court · 1975
- Adams v. Hunter CollegeCivil Court of the City of New York · 1976
- Greiner v. GershmanNew York Supreme Court · 1959
- 935 Park Avenue Realties, Inc. v. WeaverNew York Supreme Court · 1958
- Patrolmen's Benevolent Ass'n v. WagnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959