Legal Opinion

Judson v. Frankel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 13, 1952PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Voorhis, J.

This complaint, now challenged as insufficient in law, alleges that plaintiffs are statutory tenants residing in individual apartments at 1185 Park Avenue in the borough of Manhattan. On behalf of a “ Protective Committee ” of tenants, they are opposing the inauguration of a so-called co-operative plan proposed by defendants for that apartment house, pursuant, to which tenants may be evicted unless they agree to purchase their several apartments on a co-operative basis. Defendants contend that they have acted under the authority of Subdivision 3 of section 55 of the Rent and Eviction…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. People ex rel. McGoldrick v. SterlingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
  2. Richards v. KaskelNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. Gilligan v. Tishman Realty & Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
  4. Barbee v. 2639 Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
  5. Hoenig v. McGoldrickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API