Legal Opinion

Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Garrett

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1881PublishedCited by 4 opinions

PROM DAVIDSON. Appeal in error from the Law Court of Davidson county. J. C. Guild, J.

1Opinion of the CourtFreeman, J.

This action is brought to recover damages for being “ wrongfully, wantonly and maliciously ejected from defendant’s cars, whereby the party was greatly injured,” etc., as appears by the first count of the declaration. We need not consider any question arising on the second count, averring the tender of a tax receipt in payment of the fare, as the circuit judge ruled in favor of the defendant on that count, holding the tender not good, and the verdict of the jury is evidently based on the first count alone.-

A preliminary question is presented as to exceptions taken to reading the deposition of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Scribner v. BeachNew York Supreme Court · 1847

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Huckeby v. SpanglerTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Smith v. SheltonTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Kirk v. Seattle Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Lambert Bros. v. LarkinsTennessee Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API