Ross v. Ross
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WILKINS, Justice:
Plaintiff brought this action to modify a California divorce decree, which we recognize he could properly do, 1 and defendant counterclaimed for accrued but unpaid alimony and child support. The Utah State Department of Social Services, through the Bureau of Recovery Services (herein “Recovery Services”) intervened seeking reim-bursemént from plaintiff for assistance payments made to defendant from October, 1972 to August, 1973.
Plaintiff appeals from that part of the District Court’s judgment awarding $24,457 to defendant, and $1,544 to the State of Utah. On cross-appeal,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Larsen v. LarsenUtah Supreme Court · 1956
- Stanton v. StantonUtah Supreme Court · 1974
- Ediger v. EdigerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1971
- JP Koch, Inc. v. JC Penney Company, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1975
- Openshaw v. OpenshawUtah Supreme Court · 1935
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hunter v. HunterUtah Supreme Court · 1983
- Hirschfield v. HirschfieldCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
- Knudson v. Utah State Department of Social ServicesUtah Supreme Court · 1983
- Carlsen v. State, Department of Social ServicesUtah Supreme Court · 1986
- Hunter v. HunterUtah Supreme Court · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.