Legal Opinion

Ross v. Ross

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1979No. 15800, 15830PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILKINS, Justice:

Plaintiff brought this action to modify a California divorce decree, which we recognize he could properly do, 1 and defendant counterclaimed for accrued but unpaid alimony and child support. The Utah State Department of Social Services, through the Bureau of Recovery Services (herein “Recovery Services”) intervened seeking reim-bursemént from plaintiff for assistance payments made to defendant from October, 1972 to August, 1973.

Plaintiff appeals from that part of the District Court’s judgment awarding $24,457 to defendant, and $1,544 to the State of Utah. On cross-appeal,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Larsen v. LarsenUtah Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Stanton v. StantonUtah Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Ediger v. EdigerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1971
  4. JP Koch, Inc. v. JC Penney Company, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Openshaw v. OpenshawUtah Supreme Court · 1935

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hunter v. HunterUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Hirschfield v. HirschfieldCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
  3. Knudson v. Utah State Department of Social ServicesUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Carlsen v. State, Department of Social ServicesUtah Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Hunter v. HunterUtah Supreme Court · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API