Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Ronald Knipfer

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 2015No. 2013AP000578Published

1DissentShirley S. Abrahamson, C.J.

¶ 62. (.dissenting). The majority disregards its own reasoning to reach a result its opinion does not support.

¶ 63. It might be difficult to determine in some cases whether a particular proceeding is a special proceeding.1 Nevertheless, when I apply the majority opinion's definition of a "special proceeding" to the instant cases, the most legally sound conclusion is that proceedings on a Chapter 980 petition for discharge are special proceedings.

¶ 64. Wisconsin Stat. § 907.02(1) (2011-12) sets forth the Daubert standard for the admissibility of expert testimony.2 In enacting this statute, the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. State v. WestWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Hubbard v. MesserWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Eileen W. Legue v. City of RacineWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Maroney v. AmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API