Legal Opinion

Binnicker v. Adden

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 11, 1944No. 15650PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Associate Justice Stuices

delivered the majority Opinion of the Court:

The appeal is from an order sustaining a demurrer to the complaint. The latter contained allegations that defendants owned a block of store buildings in the business district of the city of Orangeburg which were set back about six feet from the sidewalk, the intervening strip of land -being the property of the defendants.

Over this strip defendants constructed separate cement walkways to each of the stores, about three feet wide, which slanted up to the entrances to the buildings, which three-foot cement entrance walkways…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hurlburt v. ShermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  2. Timmons v. Williams Wood Products Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
  3. Medlock v. McAlisterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hull v. Bishop-Stoddard CafeteriaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947
  2. State v. Columbus Hall Asso.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Daniels v. TimmonsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1950
  4. Winburn v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API