Legal Opinion
Mahoney v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided December 30, 1929PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCarroll, J.
The plaintiff, as a customer, entered a store owned and occupied by the defendant. She was at the time fifteen years of age. A sled, used by one of the defendant’s employees in delivering orders, was leaning against a three-foot radiator in the front of the store near the entrance door, which, when opened, would “just touch the end of the radiator nearest it.” It did not appear that the door was opened while the plaintiff was in the store. There was evidence that the sled fell and injured the plaintiff. She testified that she was at the time standing two or three feet from the radiator; that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rankin v. Brockton Public Market, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
- Grogan v. O'Keeffe's Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Ginns v. C. T. Sherer Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Nye v. Louis K. Liggett Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Hofnauer v. R. H. White Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- LeBlanc v. Atlantic Building & Supply Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
- Letiecq v. Denholm & McKay Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
- Dunbar v. Ferrera Bros.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Adriance v. Henry Duncan Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Knowles v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.