Legal Opinion

Federal National Mortgage Ass'n v. Hafer

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 2015No. 41825PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

J. JONES, Justice.

The Federal National Mortgage Association (“FNMA”) purchased Russell Hafer’s home 1 at a non-judicial foreclosure sale and filed an eviction suit when Russell and his wife, Sandra, refused to vacate. The Hafers claim that the foreclosure sale was invalid because their loan servicer, American Home Mortgage Services, Inc., now known as Homeward Residential, Inc, (“Homeward”), agreed to modify the terms of Russell’s loan just prior to instituting foreclosure proceedings. They claim that Russell was therefore not in default at the time of the sale. The Hafers filed a third-party…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Wigod v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  2. Farm Credit Bank of Spokane v. StevensonIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Shawver v. Huckleberry Estates, L.L.C.Idaho Supreme Court · 2004
  4. McPheters v. MaileIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Morgan v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1948

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Seward v. Musick Auction, LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Von Wandruszka v. City of MoscowIdaho Supreme Court · 2024
  3. Dean Fuller v. Brookdale Senior Living Communities, Inc., and Brookdale Employee Services, LLCDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2026
  4. Ochoa v. Industrial Ventilation IncDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2021
  5. Rossman Law Group, PLLC v. Holcomb and CarrawayIdaho Supreme Court · 2025

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API