Legal Opinion

Stewart v. Bank of Endicott

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1914No. 11965PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Whitman county, McCroskey, J., entered February 26, 1914, dismissing an action to recover possession of personal property, upon sustaining a demurrer to the complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtGose, J.

This is an action to recover the possession of promissory notes, certificates of deposit, and money, amounting in the aggregate to more than $27,000. The defendants severally demurred to the complaint, for the reason that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The demurrers were sustained, and the plaintiffs electing to stand on their complaint, a judgment was entered dismissing the action. The plaintiffs appealed.

The alleged cause of action has its basis in a written instrument executed by the several appellants and one Alexander Stewart in his lifetime. The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lines v. Lines, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northampton County1891
  2. In re the Estate DeschampsWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Cornwell v. WulffSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Marston v. RueWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  2. First Nat. Bank of Boston v. Maine Turnpike Auth.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1957
  3. Hanley v. MostWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. State ex rel. Marshall v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Lang v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1936

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API